werkaholics (Belvoir 25a) ★★

Written by Vivian Nguyen. Purple Tape Productions. Belvoir 25a. 29 Jul – 17 Aug, 2025.

Some shows deliberately defy simple, clear interpretation and artfully invite the audience to discover meaning on their own terms (Martin Crimp’s Fewer Emergencies is an excellent recent example). Some, like werkaholics, do none of those things.

Jillian (Shirong Wu) is a struggling actor who can’t catch a break. She mostly works as a photographer/videographer for her best friend Lilian (Georgia Yenna Oom), a beauty/lifestyle influencer who has taken social media by storm. But Lilian’s followers don’t know her real life is nowhere near as glamorous as she pretends. When Jillian starts dating a new girl, Sage (Ruby Duncan), she’s unaware that Sage secretly runs the influencer-busting Instagram account Unmoi, which is determined to take Lilian down.

Shirong Wu & Georgia Yenna Oom. Photo: Lucy Parakhina.

Werkaholics sets out to critique #manifestation culture and the influencers who peddle half-truths while racking in cash from their followers. At least, that’s what it says it’s trying to do, the story quickly goes off the rails with confusing dialogue and bizarre plot developments.

For a moment, during a climactic argument in which the word “armidillo” was repeatedly used, I wondered if I had misjudged the tone of the play and this was in fact a piece of absurdist theatre. Maybe the incoherence was the whole point? Perhaps it was, in fact, some kind of meta-commentary on internet culture, or I was caught in the middle of an AI hallucination masquerading as a play? No — ChatGPT would at least produce a scene with some banal logic.

The programme notes try to hand-wave the chaos by calling it a “hyperpop aesthetic” — but this has neither the fun vibes nor the layered sensory experience of hyperpop. Werkaholics is simply a jumble of convoluted speeches, nonsensical plotting and painfully thin characterisations.

Shirong Wu. Photo: Lucy Parakhina.

On a positive note, the cast manage to produce some enjoyable work, despite every character sounding like a chatbot trained exclusively on YA melodramas and TikTok comment threads. The excellent Shirong Wu has fun playing both the distraught Jillian and Sage’s mother (in an outrageous wig). Georgia Yenna Oom juggles Lilian’s ambition and nervous energy well. The play’s highlight is a completely incomprehensible but very enthusiastic cyber-sex scene brought to life with some extremely energetic movements — Ruby Duncan does things to that TV screen that frankly stole the show.

But their good work and personal charm can only carry us so far, especially when the material feels instantly out-dated and tired. Video calls that sound like Skype. References to Perez Hilton. Sage wears sunglasses indoors as if she’s a “hacker” from The Matrix. People slowly wave their arms around like they’ve just watched Minority Report. Even the basic premise of “influencers are frauds” is played out already.

Ruby Duncan. Photo: Lucy Parakhina.

Does werkaholics tackle the modern influencer economy with originality or insight? No. Does it show an understanding of how the influencer world functions? Also no. All of this would be forgivable if werkaholics offered interesting outsider commentary or demonstrated some kind of novel point-of-view. But as it creaks towards its truly baffling conclusion (the final scene exudes real “oh-fuck-how-do-I-end-this” desperation), it’s clear the level of thought here is only one pixel deep. 

Werkaholics needs a lot more “werk.” The “fake it ’til you make it” mantra may be acceptable for wannabe influencers, but not for theatremakers asking audiences to pay for a seat.


Posted

in

, , ,

by

Comments

2 responses to “werkaholics (Belvoir 25a) ★★”

  1. delicatefuturisticallyb63ae6a6fc Avatar
    delicatefuturisticallyb63ae6a6fc

    hey- you kinda missed the whole point in your vicious ramblings.. and not going to lie.. being so awful about independent artists putting on work that infact does have a strong POV (the fact that you felt like you were in the middle of an AI Hallucination is kinda the point).

    have you heard of any FORM of theatre that breaks the 3 act structure you so clearly craved? And when you booked your $25 ticket to an independent experimental theatre show.. did you think for a second to adjust your lens and enjoy the hours of hard work and dedication everyone out into that show? Maybe google some key words like “post dramatic theatre”, “physical theatre”, “feminist theatre”… before you dare to comment on a new writers work again.

    cultural binge? Cultural UGH. GET A LIFE.

    Like

    1. Chad Armstrong Avatar
      Chad Armstrong

      Thanks for the response, I do genuinely appreciate you taking the time to write it. And while my personal review may have been more pointed than most it’s not far off the general consensus of the work that I’ve seen and I stand by it. It is my honest response to the work, which did elicit a very strong POV from me.

      There’s nothing wrong with a polarising show, in fact that’s preferable to a bland show. When I see shows I dislike my response is usually one of disappointment, but this did get a much more visceral response out of me, so I shared that without trying to hide behind veiled euphemisms and stock phrases. I have no doubt that a lot of work went into the production, but at the end of the day, what gets put on the stage is what people are being asked to pay money to watch and I do genuinely feel that the work, for all the good intentions behind it, is flawed and doesn’t reach the same standard as other independent artists & spaces in Sydney.

      Other opinions may vary – and do, I’ve seen some positive reviews out there – but for me not to convey the strength of my response to the work would be dishonest. I hope if people read a review I write, they can trust that I’m not sugar-coating my critiques or boosting my praise to gain anyone’s favour – I mean what I say, when I love a show I’ll shout about it, when I don’t I’ll say it plainly (but I also want to note, I don’t promote negative reviews. They sit on the website for those who go looking for them, but I don’t draw extra eyeballs to them via Instagram etc – EDIT: Actually I just realised I did have autopost turned on, and have now deleted the review from my FB).

      So yes, to your last point, I do ‘dare’ to comment on work, as anyone who goes to see work is entitled to – and those comments can be embraced or dismissed. People who’ve read a few of my reviews will no doubt have a sense of my personal tastes and know whether that matches their own. This is just a personal review blog after all.

      Like I said, I do appreciate your response – it’s as passionate as my review.

      Like

Leave a comment